Explorer les evidences

Palier Gold : evidences validées mécaniquement, avec leur source primaire.

1 729 evidences · page 61 / 70

8 825 womenA total of 8825 women of reproductive age living with HIV were surveyed at five comprehensive HIV treatment centres in Benue State, North-Central Nigeria between June and December 2017.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé June and December 2017publié 2022Journal of biosocial sciencePubMeddocument de 8 observations

18 %Minority variants (<20% frequency) comprised 18% of all mutations in HIV-1 sequences from participants with first-line virological failure in a Nigerian cohort.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2022The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapyPubMeddocument de 9 observations

8,9 %Non-typeable HIV-1 accounted for 8.9% of cases.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2009-12publié 2016PloS onePubMeddocument de 14 observations

32 %Among participants with endpoint assessments available, 32% (257/809) experienced immunologic failure.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2022Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)PubMeddocument de 6 observations

42,9 %Chronic lung disease (CLD) was more prevalent in people with HIV (42.9%) compared with the HIV-negative group (23%) in Lagos, Nigeria between 2018 and 2019.

Nigeriachronic lung disease · VIH/sidaobservé 2018 and 2019publié 2022AIDS (London, England)PubMeddocument de 6 observations

4,43 aORFemale sex workers residing in the North Central geopolitical zone of Nigeria had higher odds of prenatal HIV testing compared to those in the South South zone (adjusted odds ratio = 4.43).

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2024International journal of STD & AIDSPubMeddocument de 12 observations

45,6 %Among the 344 women living with HIV, 157 (45.6%) were pre-menopausal, 12 (3.4%) were peri-menopausal, and 175 (51%) were post-menopausal.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2025West African journal of medicinePubMeddocument de 10 observations

41 %In this study, 41% of the 117 youth living with HIV/AIDS in Lagos State demonstrated good sexual and reproductive health knowledge.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2022publié 2025African journal of reproductive healthPubMeddocument de 7 observations

0,47 t_statisticAt 24 weeks, there was no statistically significant change in self-reported depressive symptoms compared to baseline (mean 2.89 vs 2.62; t36=0.47, 95% CI −0.74 to 1.44).

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2025JMIR formative researchPubMeddocument de 7 observations

1,93 AORThe adjusted odds ratio for repeat HIV testing among HIV-negative pregnant women at term referred by TBAs in cluster 2 was 1.93 (95% CI [1.3–2.89]).

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2024BMC pregnancy and childbirthPubMeddocument de 8 observations

92 %There was a statistically significant reduction in support for viral load testing after the PEPFAR policy change (92% vs. 64%, p = 0.02).

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé October 2014–September 2015publié 2019PloS onePubMeddocument de 11 observations

65,5 %Among young key populations aged 15–24 years in Nigeria, the most cited barrier to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake was low risk perception (65.5%) among people who inject drugs.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2020publié 2024International journal of STD & AIDSPubMeddocument de 5 observations

37,1 %Among HIV-positive clients in Makurdi, Benue state, Nigeria, Bitter cola/Kola nut was used by 37.1%.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2022West African journal of medicinePubMeddocument de 7 observations

HIV-related knowledge was significantly better in the intervention group at endline.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2020Journal of medical Internet researchPubMeddocument de 5 observations

5,56 odds_ratioAPOL1 high-risk genotype participants were at higher risk of having both an eGFR under 60 ml/min/1.73m² and urine/albumin creatinine ratio over 300 mg/g (adjusted odds ratio 5.56, 95% confidence interval 1.57–19.69).

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2021Kidney internationalPubMeddocument de 7 observations

79 %Among Test and Treat patients with a documented viral load, 79% were suppressed (≤400 copies/ml) at six months.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2019PloS onePubMeddocument de 7 observations

2,5 %Among 204,930 participants aged ≥18 months in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS) 2018, 5,103 (2.5%) were reactive on test 1 (Determine HIV-1/2).

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2018publié 2022PLOS global public healtheurope_pmcdocument de 10 observations

77,3 %Acceptability of the HIV test services was high (77.3%) among clients 20–49 years of age.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2019publié 2024BMC primary carePubMeddocument de 8 observations

32,6 %Needle stick prick accounted for 32.6% of occupational exposures to HIV among healthcare workers.

NigeriaVIH/sidapublié 2020BMC public healthPubMeddocument de 7 observations

12,06 aPRInfants who had mixed feeding had an adjusted Prevalence Ratio of 12.06 for HIV positivity.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2010 to 2016publié 2021Current HIV researchPubMeddocument de 6 observations

17,2 %Sick euthyroid syndrome had a prevalence of 17.2% among HAART-naïve HIV sero-positive patients.

Nigeriasick euthyroid syndrome · VIH/sidapublié 2021West African journal of medicinePubMeddocument de 6 observations

95 %HIV-exposed infants on nevirapine prophylaxis were 95% less likely to be infected with HIV.

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2010 to 2016publié 2021Current HIV researchPubMeddocument de 6 observations

25 %The relative risk for mother-to-child transmission of HIV for women with placenta malaria density greater than 5000 was 25%, with a 95% confidence interval of 11.41–54.76%.

Nigeriapaludisme · VIH/sidapublié 2020Malaria journalPubMeddocument de 5 observations

11,4 %HIV seropositive women on HAART co-infected with HSV-2 had a cervical lesion prevalence of 11.4%.

NigeriaCervical Lesions · Herpes Simplex Virus Type-2 · VIH/sidapublié 2022Current HIV researchPubMeddocument de 4 observations

1 900 000 inhabitantsIn 2021, Nigeria had an estimated 1.9 million people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV).

NigeriaVIH/sidaobservé 2021publié 2024Journal of research in health sciencesPubMeddocument de 5 observations

Chaque ligne mène à son document source. Le nombre indiqué est celui des observations VALIDÉES qu'il porte, jamais celui des observations extraites : les deux diffèrent sur la plupart des documents. L'extrait exact du texte source n'est pas publié, par contrainte de droit d'auteur.