Knowledge Graph
100 nodes balanced by type — diseases, countries, researchers, publications, evidence. Click to expand.
Evidence for the node
click a node in the graph
No node selected. The explorer below stays searchable.
The broken outline
A node with an open outline has more neighbours than the graph shows: expanding returns at most 50. The mark is set before any click, so the reader knows what is worth opening.
Hidden relationships
578 of 1,218 relationships are not drawn: at entry, two entities are linked only from 10 shared publications upward. Two entities are linked only from 2 shared publications upward. Relationships resting on a single one are hidden — 12,299 of 22,541. A graph that hides without saying so reads as complete.
Why these hundred nodes
A degree ranking could contain no researcher: the researcher → publication → evidence chain covers only 22.4% of the corpus, and their degrees are two orders of magnitude below those of countries. These hundred nodes are therefore balanced by type — 30 diseases, 25 countries, 15 evidence, 15 publications, 15 researchers — and 30 of them are bridges, drawn hollow: kept not for their importance but for what they connect. Without them the author chain would not appear at all.
Explore the corpus
Independent of the graph: what exists, whatever you look at above.
No validated evidence matches. The term is searched in the claim text, not in normalised labels.
Entry composition: 30 diseases, 25 countries, 15 evidence, 15 publications, 15 researchers. 30 bridges of 100.