Gold tier: mechanically validated evidence, with its primary source.
7 evidence items · page 1 / 1
4.5 aORUnderweight was associated with low birth weight, with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.5 (95% confidence interval: 2.5–8.1) in infants from Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonfaible poids de naissance · malnutritionobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
21 %At 12 months of life, 21% of 530 infants presented with underweight in Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonmalnutritionobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
2.6 aORStunting was associated with low birth weight, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.4–4.9) in infants from Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonfaible poids de naissance · malnutritionobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
5.4 aORPreterm birth was associated with underweight, with an adjusted odds ratio of 5.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.7–16.1) at one month of life in infants from Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonmalnutrition · preterm birthobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
10 %At one month of life, 10% of 743 infants presented with stunting in Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonmalnutritionobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
4 %At one month of life, 4% of 743 infants presented with underweight in Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonmalnutritionobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
7 %The proportion of infants with wasting remained constant at 7% throughout the follow-up period in Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon.
Gabonmalnutritionobserved 2009–2012published 2021PloS oneeurope_pmcdocument of 8 observationsDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246694
Every row leads to its source document. The figure shown counts the VALIDATED observations it carries, never the extracted ones: the two differ on most documents. The exact source excerpt is not published, due to copyright constraints.